DIGGING FOR FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES

It seems like every week there is a new report from some activist organization trying to push the mythical narrative that the production of oil and natural gas in Canada is heavily subsidized.

 

They are simply wrong.

 

Take for example a report this week by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) – one of the leading publishers of ‘fossil fuel subsidy reports’.

 

Their report alleges Canada subsidized fossil-fuel producers with $16 billion in aid in response to the pandemic, while providing very little to other priorities.

 

That $16 billion figured seemed a lot higher than anything we have seen reported, so we decided to take a look at their numbers.

 

Interestingly, the IISD’s report includes a number of initiatives any reasonable person would find a stretch to consider a ‘fossil fuel subsidy’. Here’s a list:

 

  • ‘Highway and bridge replacements as part of Ontario’s Action Plan: Responding to COVID-19’ – $1.9 Billion.
  • Highway and bridge investments, Alberta $234.43 million.
  • ‘Stimulus to advance highway projects’ in Manitoba.
  • Funding for lost revenues in the aviation industry in the Yukon, $9.96 million.
  • Reduction in vehicle registration fees in Manitoba $8.06 million.
  • Purchase of natural gas power plants in Ontario for electricity generation – $2.05 billion.
  • Waiving of rent for ground leases for 21 airport authorities – $242.78 million.

 

To us, it seems a little odd to include infrastructure investments designed to put people back to work under the umbrella of ‘fossil fuel subsidies’ – it is even weirder to include state-owned insurance providers reducing vehicle registration fees when no one is driving. And last we checked, a Tesla still requires a road.

 

NONE of those are subsidies for the oil and gas industry or could even be considered direct support for oil and oil natural gas production.

 

In fact, the entire narrative activist groups have created on oil and natural gas production being heavily subsidized does not exist – which has been recently confirmed by our own federal government.

 

According to a briefing note from Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN):

“Given the nature of NRCAN’s direct spending (i.e. innovation and environmental performance), the department does not provide any inefficient fossil fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful production or consumption of fossil fuels.”

 

And, in recently speaking with the National Observer, Federal Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, Catherine McKenna stated “we eliminated all of the fossil fuel subsidies at the federal level”.

 

These activist publications have the right to advocate for their cause, but not with inaccurate or misleading information on an industry so integral to Canada’s economic recovery and continued prosperity.

Share this page

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Share this page

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

Related Posts

DINNER IN FORT ST. JOHN

DINNER IN FORT ST. JOHN

As Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) Builder’s Circle Partners CAPP and the Canada’s Energy Citizens Outreach Team recently travelled to Fort St John to attend a speaking event hosted by the ICBA featuring Rex Murphy. Sadly, Rex was sick and unable to make it. As a result the event was canceled and is being rescheduled.

OUTREACH TEAM VISITS KAMLOOPS & 100 MILE HOUSE

When we talk about 100 Mile House and the City of Kamloops the title “oil and gas towns” rarely come to mind. Forestry and mining are usually considered to be this region’s main focus. What you might not know is that while these communities don’t directly extract oil & gas in the upstream they are major transportation hubs for the oil and gas infrastructure in British Columbia and the Pacific Northwest.

THANK A TRUCKER

THANK A TRUCKER

We partnered with a local BC business in Prince George to provide 100 free meals to truckers.